-1. After 4-6 weeks, crayfish were recovered, and a subsequent rice crop was harvested. Crayfish more than doubled in weight after relaying, and 87% of the reharvested crayfish were in the two largest, most valuable size categories. Average recovery ranged from 75% of the total weight stocked to 131% and was affected by stocking rate. Highest recovery rates and largest crayfish were generally inversely proportional to stocking rate. Moreover, a satisfactory rice yield was achieved after the crayfish harvest. Rice yield was reduced 24% by intercropping (due mainly to presence of trapping lanes), but the economic gain from relaying may more than offset the net loss from rice. Attempts to harvest crayfish with nets during normal water discharge, in lieu of trap harvesting that reduces rice yield, were deemed unsuitable because of poor crayfish recovery. More research and further economic analyses are needed before specific recommendations can by made, but results from this 5-year study generally support the concept of integrating crayfish and rice production in a relay-reharvest management approach, especially for those farming operations that normally function as integrated rice/crawfish operations." />
Issue Cover image

logo

Freshwater Crayfish 11(1): 533-549 (1996)

PEER REVIEWED    RESEARCH ARTICLE

Download: PDF (760 KB)

Relaying crayfish: summary of an intercropping approach

McClain WR and Bollich PK  e-mail link

Published Online:

Abstract

Transferring, or "relaying," small crayfish from overcrowded, food deficient, production ponds to rice fields consistently encouraged further growth and substantially increased their marketing value. Crayfish of minimal marketing size (mean weight= 13.5 g) were stocked into newly established rice fields at rates of 280, 560, 840, and 1,120 kg ha-1. After 4-6 weeks, crayfish were recovered, and a subsequent rice crop was harvested. Crayfish more than doubled in weight after relaying, and 87% of the reharvested crayfish were in the two largest, most valuable size categories. Average recovery ranged from 75% of the total weight stocked to 131% and was affected by stocking rate. Highest recovery rates and largest crayfish were generally inversely proportional to stocking rate. Moreover, a satisfactory rice yield was achieved after the crayfish harvest. Rice yield was reduced 24% by intercropping (due mainly to presence of trapping lanes), but the economic gain from relaying may more than offset the net loss from rice. Attempts to harvest crayfish with nets during normal water discharge, in lieu of trap harvesting that reduces rice yield, were deemed unsuitable because of poor crayfish recovery. More research and further economic analyses are needed before specific recommendations can by made, but results from this 5-year study generally support the concept of integrating crayfish and rice production in a relay-reharvest management approach, especially for those farming operations that normally function as integrated rice/crawfish operations.

Supplemental Documents

  • There are no supplementary documents for this article

CrossRef Logo

Cited By

Citations:

How to Cite

McClain WR and Bollich PK. (1996). Relaying crayfish: summary of an intercropping approach. Freshwater Crayfish 11(1):533-549. doi: 10.5869/fc.1997.v11.533

 

 

Author Information

Authorship information for this paper are currently unavailable.

 

Publication History

   Manuscript Submitted:

   Manuscript Accepted:

   Published Online:

   Published in Print:

 

 

Funding Information

No specific funding statement is available for this article.

 

 



 

 

 

Member Login

Forgot Your Password?

Recover PW

Enter the e-mail address you used to
create your IAA account.
Return to Login
Back to Top