none none 0363-2415 1548-8446 Fisheries Fisheries Managing Pathways for Introduction of Alien Crayfish: Evaluation of a Midwestern State's Regulations on the Pet Industry Robert J. DiStefano Mael G. Glon Bailey M. O'Brian 48 5 190 2023 full_text 10.1002/fsh.10895 00222011 Journal of Invertebrate Pathology Journal of Invertebrate Pathology Alternosema astaquatica n. sp. (Microsporidia: Enterocytozoonida), a systemic parasite of the crayfish Faxonius virilis Cheyenne E. Stratton Lindsey S. Reisinger Donald C. Behringer Aaron W. Reinke Jamie Bojko 107948 107948 2023 full_text 10.1016/j.jip.2023.107948 1092-6194 Northeastern Naturalist Northeastern Naturalist Diversity, Distribution and Habitat Use of Freshwater Crayfish in the Upper Appomattox River Basin, Virginia Sujan Henkanaththegedara David Conner Connor Perry Zachary Loughman 28 2 2021 10.1656/045.028.0213 FRESHWATER CRAYFISH: Is Native Crayfish Conservation a Priority for United States and Canadian Fish and Wildlife Agencies?
Issue Cover image

logo

Freshwater Crayfish 26(1): 25-36 (2021)

PEER REVIEWED    RESEARCH ARTICLE

Download: PDF (5.90 MB)

Is Native Crayfish Conservation a Priority for United States and Canadian Fish and Wildlife Agencies?

Stratton CE and DiStefano RJ  e-mail link

Published Online: 2/12/2021

Abstract

Crayfish are key organisms in freshwater ecosystems across the United States (USA) and Canada, yet are among their most highly imperiled taxonomic groups. In 1996, a committee of prominent USA crayfish biologists warned of a crayfish imperilment plight and neglect of the fauna by natural resources agencies. It is unclear whether crayfish conservation has been prioritized by those agencies in the intervening decades. Our objective was to evaluate the status of crayfish conservation and management in 50 USA and 13 Canadian fish and wildlife agencies through a telephone survey. Fifty-one percent of agencies employed biologists to conduct crayfish work, mostly in the southern USA, and focused on threats (e.g., invasive species) or species’ distributions and conservation status. Of the 32 agencies working on crayfish, 59% considered them a priority, but 53% acknowledged insufficient funding. The most commonly cited information needs were threats, species compositions (native and introduced), distributions, conservation status assessments, and ecology. We report an encouraging but limited increase in agencies working on crayfish over the past two decades.

CrossRef Logo

Cited By

0 Citations:

How to Cite

Stratton CE and DiStefano RJ. (2021). Is Native Crayfish Conservation a Priority for United States and Canadian Fish and Wildlife Agencies?. Freshwater Crayfish 26(1):25-36. doi: 10.5869/fc.2021.v26-1.25

 

 

Author Information

Cheyenne E. Stratton,* Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, University of Florida, 7922 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL, USA32653. E-mail: c.stratton@ufl.edu

Robert J. DiStefano, Science Branch, Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 East Gans Road, Columbia, MO, USA65201. E-mail: Bob.DiStefano@mdc.mo.gov

Corresponding Author indicated by an *.

 

Publication History

   Manuscript Submitted: 10/9/2020

   Manuscript Accepted: 2/9/2021

   Published Online: 2/12/2021

   Published in Print: 4/15/2021

 

 

Funding Information

No specific funding statement is available for this article.

 

 



 

 

 

Member Login

Forgot Your Password?

Recover PW

Enter the e-mail address you used to
create your IAA account.
Return to Login
Back to Top