none none 0018-8158 1573-5117 Hydrobiologia Hydrobiologia Not all methods are created equal: assessment of sampling methods for crayfishes and fishes in southern Appalachian streams Zanethia C. Barnett Clifford A. Ochs Jason D. Hoeksema Susan B. Adams 848 7 1491 2021 full_text 10.1007/s10750-021-04531-y 0278-0372 1937-240X Journal of Crustacean Biology Habitat use and life history of the vernal crayfish, Procambarus viaeviridis (Faxon, 1914), a secondary burrowing crayfish in Mississippi, USA Zanethia C Barnett Susan B Adams Rebecca L Rosamond 37 5 544 2017 full_text 10.1093/jcbiol/rux073 20764324 20764332 Freshwater Crayfish Freshwater Crayfish Preliminary investigation of the critically imperiled Caney Mountain cave crayfishOrconectes stygocaneyi(Hobbs III, 2001) (Decapoda: Cambaridae) in Missouri, USA Robert J. DiStefano David Ashley Shannon K. Brewer Joshua B. Mouser Matthew Niemiller 25 1 47 2020 full_text 10.5869/fc.2020.v25-1.047 0028-8330 1175-8805 New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research Evaluation of a traditional Māori harvesting method for sampling kōura (freshwater crayfish, Paranephrops planifrons ) and toi toi (bully, Gobiomorphus spp.) populations in two New Zealand streams Ian A. Kusabs Brendan J. Hicks John M. Quinn William L. Perry Hēmi Whaanga 52 4 603 2018 full_text 10.1080/00288330.2018.1481437 1961-9502 Knowledge & Management of Aquatic Ecosystems Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. Trapping for invasive crayfish: comparisons of efficacy and selectivity of baited traps versus novel artificial refuge traps Nicky Green Matt Bentley Paul Stebbing Demetra Andreou Robert Britton 419 15 2018 full_text 10.1051/kmae/2018007 2077-1312 Journal of Marine Science and Engineering JMSE Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers Zhaohai Cheng Margaret H. Folkins Liuyi Huang Ye Li 10 11 1708 2022 full_text 10.3390/jmse10111708 2296-701X Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution Front. Ecol. Evol. Review of Dam Effects on Native and Invasive Crayfishes Illustrates Complex Choices for Conservation Planning Zanethia C. Barnett Susan B. Adams 8 621723 2021 full_text 10.3389/fevo.2020.621723 978-1-4665-8639-0 978-1-4665-8640-6 Freshwater Crayfish A Review of Current Techniques for Sampling Freshwater Crayfish Stephanie Parkyn 205 2015 full_text 10.1201/b18723-13 0275-5947 1548-8675 North American Journal of Fisheries Management N American J Fish Manag Comparison of Two Crayfish Trapping Methods in Coastal Plain Seasonal Wetlands Zanethia C. Barnett Susan B. Adams 38 4 911 2018 full_text 10.1002/nafm.10188 FRESHWATER CRAYFISH: Comparison of constructed microhabitat and baited traps in Table Rock Reservoir, Missouri, USA.
Issue Cover image

logo

Freshwater Crayfish 18(1): 69-74 (2011)

PEER REVIEWED    RESEARCH ARTICLE

Download: PDF (1.35 Mb)

Comparison of constructed microhabitat and baited traps in Table Rock Reservoir, Missouri, USA.

Parkyn SM, DiStefano RJ and Imhoff E  e-mail link

Published Online: 12/31/2011

Abstract

Baited traps are the conventional method for sampling crayfish in lentic environments although this trapping method suffers several biases. We compared crayfish CPUE, size, and sex ratios in baited traps and microhabitat traps (constructed from cedar (Juniperus virginiana) branches) deployed in Table Rock Reservoir, Missouri, USA. Smaller size classes of Orconectes longidigitus (< 35 mm rostrum carapace length (RCL)) and the full size range of Orconectes ozarkae (4.8 – 29.2 mm RCL) were found in the cedar bundles and not encountered using conventional baited traps. Nightly trapping yielded 1:1 sex ratios in microhabitat traps, but when these traps were deployed for up to 12 nights the sex ratio favoured females (c. 70%). Baited traps were biased towards O. longidigitus (only two O. ozarkae were caught in baited traps), males (65%), and sizes > 35 mm RCL. Microhabitat traps were effective in both pebble/gravel and boulder/bedrock dominated sites and resulted in higher catch rates at 7 m depths rather than shallow 2 m depths (P < 0.01 in 12-night deployment for both species), but they were not adequate for sampling large O. longidigitus. These structurally complex microhabitat traps show promise as a representative sampling method when matched to species size, and for studies of juvenile recruitment.

Supplemental Documents

  • There are no supplementary documents for this article

CrossRef Logo

Cited By

0 Citations:

How to Cite

Parkyn SM, DiStefano RJ and Imhoff E. (2011). Comparison of constructed microhabitat and baited traps in Table Rock Reservoir, Missouri, USA. Freshwater Crayfish 18(1):69-74. doi: 10.5869/fc.2011.v18.69

 

 

Author Information

Stephanie  Parkyn,* 7 Hampden Rd, Freshwater Consultant, Battery Pt, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia7004. E-mail: johnson.parkyn@gmail.com

Robert J. DiStefano, Conservation, Missouri Department of Conservation, 1110 S. College Ave, Colombia, MO, USA65201. E-mail: Bob.DiStefano@mdc.mo.gov

Emily  M. Imhoff, Conservation, Missouri Department of Conservation, 1110 S. College Ave, Columbia, MO, USA65201. E-mail: Emily.Imhoff@mdc.mo.gov

Corresponding Author indicated by an *.

 

Publication History

   Manuscript Submitted: 12/10/2010

   Manuscript Accepted: 8/15/2011

   Published Online: 12/31/2011

   Published in Print: 12/31/2011

 

 

Funding Information

No specific funding statement is available for this article.

 

 



 

 

 

Member Login

Forgot Your Password?

Recover PW

Enter the e-mail address you used to
create your IAA account.
Return to Login
Back to Top