none none 2167-8359 PeerJ A multi-method approach for assessing the distribution of a rare, burrowing North American crayfish species Kathleen B. Quebedeaux Christopher A. Taylor Amanda N. Curtis Eric R. Larson 11 e14748 e14748 2023 full_text 10.7717/peerj.14748 20764324 20764332 Freshwater Crayfish Freshwater Crayfish Stream-Dwelling Crayfishes of the North Fork of the White River Drainage of Missouri, with Additional Notes from Arkansas, USA Robert J. DiStefano Erica L. Ascani Robert B. Bratcher Ashley N. Hrdina Emile A. Ellingsworth Brian K. Watson 28 1 11 2023 full_text 10.5869/fc.2023.v28-1.11 0046-5070 1365-2427 Freshwater Biology Freshwater Biology Environmental DNA detects a rare large river crayfish but with little relation to local abundance Christopher J. Rice Eric R. Larson Christopher A. Taylor 63 5 443 2018 full_text 10.1111/fwb.13081 FRESHWATER CRAYFISH: Site specific assessments of burrow- and lentic-dwelling crayfish communities: A proposed sampling design
Issue Cover image

You need to login to your IAA account in order to access jounral PDFs.
Member Login
logo

Freshwater Crayfish 21(1): 63-69 (2015)

PEER REVIEWED    RESEARCH ARTICLE

Download: PDF (486 KB)

Site specific assessments of burrow- and lentic-dwelling crayfish communities: A proposed sampling design

Taylor CA, Engelbert BS and DiStefano RJ  e-mail link

Published Online: 12/31/2015

Abstract

We conducted a study to investigate methods to assess crayfish populations typically found in low gradient, lentic, floodplain habitats in Missouri. We used a random site selection process that allowed us to capture all known species from this region of Missouri. We compared two sampling methods for primary burrowing crayfishes at our sampling sites: hook-and-line capture technique and burrow excavation. Adjacent standing water habitats at sites were also sampled using a timed search method. Hook-and-line capture success was substantially less than reported in the literature (0.7% versus 80%), while burrow excavation was higher than reported (64% versus 40.7%). We successfully captured six crayfish species using burrow excavation, whereas lentic timed search sampling captured nine species in adjacent standing waters at our sampling sites. Our results suggest that additional efforts sampling lentic habitats rather than additional time searching for and excavating burrows is more likely to capture total community richness. We found a seasonal influence on burrow occupancy surveys, as Julian day was positively correlated to finding active crayfish burrows. Crayfish capture in standing water was positively affected by soil temperature, and negatively correlated to Julian day.

Supplemental Documents

  • There are no supplementary documents for this article

CrossRef Logo

Cited By

0 Citations:

How to Cite

Taylor CA, Engelbert BS and DiStefano RJ. (2015). Site specific assessments of burrow- and lentic-dwelling crayfish communities: A proposed sampling design. Freshwater Crayfish 21(1):63-69. doi: 10.5869/fc.2015.v21-1.63

 

 

Author Information

Christopher A. Taylor,* Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, 1816 S. Oak, Champaign, Illinois, USA61820. E-mail: ctaylor@inhs.illinois.edu

Bryan S. Engelbert, Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, 1816 S. Oak, Champaign, Illinois, USA61820. E-mail: bengelbert@utah.gov

Robert J. DiStefano, Missouri Department of Conservation, Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E. Glans Road, Columbia, Missouri, USA65201. E-mail: robert.distefano@mde.mo.gov

Corresponding Author indicated by an *.

 

Publication History

   Manuscript Submitted: 6/18/2015

   Manuscript Accepted: 12/10/2015

   Published Online: 12/31/2015

   Published in Print: 12/31/2015

 

 

Funding Information

No specific funding statement is available for this article.

 

 



 

 

 

Member Login

Forgot Your Password?

Recover PW

Enter the e-mail address you used to
create your IAA account.
Return to Login
Back to Top